<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Social Networking Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/</link>
	<description>In the realm of ideas, everything depends on enthusiasm; in the real world, all rests on perseverance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Unrest Cure</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unrest Cure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Anonymous: I haven't elobrated on "Segmentation based on other critera", but that is what you're talking about. I can give examples, if you want:
1. SEraja, illaka, eventful and several others are event related web 2.0 sites that offer limited interaction between users, but that could be evolved.
2. Occupation - ryze and linked in. Even rediff connexions, which never really took off. jigsaw might fit this criteria
3. Freelance work - scriptlance, guru, elance, rentacoder...

In my opinion, this segment is most likely to survive...sites that can really work are of the b2m type - business to money...sites that help users make money and grow in the process. Ebay is a marketplace and a community.

Social networking sites will evolve models that will help users make money, and will be in direct competition in this space. Watch for consolidation after the weaker pieces fall off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous: I haven&#8217;t elobrated on &#8220;Segmentation based on other critera&#8221;, but that is what you&#8217;re talking about. I can give examples, if you want:<br />
1. SEraja, illaka, eventful and several others are event related web 2.0 sites that offer limited interaction between users, but that could be evolved.<br />
2. Occupation - ryze and linked in. Even rediff connexions, which never really took off. jigsaw might fit this criteria<br />
3. Freelance work - scriptlance, guru, elance, rentacoder&#8230;</p>
<p>In my opinion, this segment is most likely to survive&#8230;sites that can really work are of the b2m type - business to money&#8230;sites that help users make money and grow in the process. Ebay is a marketplace and a community.</p>
<p>Social networking sites will evolve models that will help users make money, and will be in direct competition in this space. Watch for consolidation after the weaker pieces fall off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Nikhil - in your examples you have picked websites that are not purely commercial in their focus. If you consider LinkedIn or eCademy where grown-ups go to do more than Hi5 their friends but make useful contacts, search and advertise jobs etc, you would have different views i imagine. LinkedIn however does not do anything that sixdegrees.com - a Web 1.0 website way back in 1995 or so - did not do, except have a clear revenue model. Sixdegrees.com was ahead of its time :-) And you were at school then but of course I knew you then but for now I shall refrain from saying more as I am posting an anon note</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikhil - in your examples you have picked websites that are not purely commercial in their focus. If you consider LinkedIn or eCademy where grown-ups go to do more than Hi5 their friends but make useful contacts, search and advertise jobs etc, you would have different views i imagine. LinkedIn however does not do anything that sixdegrees.com - a Web 1.0 website way back in 1995 or so - did not do, except have a clear revenue model. Sixdegrees.com was ahead of its time :-) And you were at school then but of course I knew you then but for now I shall refrain from saying more as I am posting an anon note</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bewra kekra</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>bewra kekra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>For illusions:

Or move to Wordpress and save yourself much maatha-pachchi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For illusions:</p>
<p>Or move to Wordpress and save yourself much maatha-pachchi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unrest Cure</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unrest Cure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Me, Techie? I just observe businesses and trends.

About categories - I actually do have a solution, that I've been looking to implement at mixedbag and doingdelhi.

Register at &lt;a HREF="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow"&gt;del.icio.us&lt;/A&gt;, and create your own tags. Manually tag each post after you've posted it, and post the category name in your sidebar.

&lt;a HREF="http://2x3x7.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Falstaff&lt;/A&gt;has implemented this. I tried with technorati, and it failed. Now, there's no time to categorise each post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, Techie? I just observe businesses and trends.</p>
<p>About categories - I actually do have a solution, that I&#8217;ve been looking to implement at mixedbag and doingdelhi.</p>
<p>Register at <a HREF="http://del.icio.us" rel="nofollow">del.icio.us</a>, and create your own tags. Manually tag each post after you&#8217;ve posted it, and post the category name in your sidebar.</p>
<p><a HREF="http://2x3x7.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Falstaff</a>has implemented this. I tried with technorati, and it failed. Now, there&#8217;s no time to categorise each post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illusions</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>illusions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-552</guid>
		<description>I learned something new...and since you seem to be such a techiw how about helping me create a travel blog sort of a thing? Am struggling with a template that can have categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned something new&#8230;and since you seem to be such a techiw how about helping me create a travel blog sort of a thing? Am struggling with a template that can have categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unrest Cure</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unrest Cure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>ouch ouch ouch. I try to avoid jargon, but I guess I can't explain ny views without using terms like segmentation.  Word-of-mouth is better than viral marketing, yes?

verfication code: jstbbc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ouch ouch ouch. I try to avoid jargon, but I guess I can&#8217;t explain ny views without using terms like segmentation.  Word-of-mouth is better than viral marketing, yes?</p>
<p>verfication code: jstbbc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight Curves</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight Curves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>erm...I 'capisch' you using a lot of jargon, alright! You marketing thoroughbred you! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>erm&#8230;I &#8216;capisch&#8217; you using a lot of jargon, alright! You marketing thoroughbred you! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Unrest Cure</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>The Unrest Cure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Well, Web 2.0 represents a paradigm shift in the way business is conducted online. Mostly, it now represents businesses that have a collaborative, user-driven way of functioning. It's an idea that is spreading to other domains as well - look at CNN-IBN's 'citizen journalist' idea. You make a user a part of the system.
Capisch?

(That's what Web 2.0 means to me...there's a lot of confusion and debate. Some clarity &lt;a HREF="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Web 2.0 represents a paradigm shift in the way business is conducted online. Mostly, it now represents businesses that have a collaborative, user-driven way of functioning. It&#8217;s an idea that is spreading to other domains as well - look at CNN-IBN&#8217;s &#8216;citizen journalist&#8217; idea. You make a user a part of the system.<br />
Capisch?</p>
<p>(That&#8217;s what Web 2.0 means to me&#8230;there&#8217;s a lot of confusion and debate. Some clarity <a HREF="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight Curves</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/08/11/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight Curves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/the-future-of-social-networking-sites/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>ummm...what are 'web 2.0' sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm&#8230;what are &#8216;web 2.0&#8242; sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

