<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: unCERT-IN reasoning = Blogger Blockage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/07/18/uncert-in-reasoning-blogger-blockage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/07/18/uncert-in-reasoning-blogger-blockage/</link>
	<description>In the realm of ideas, everything depends on enthusiasm; in the real world, all rests on perseverance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emilie-Roulett</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/07/18/uncert-in-reasoning-blogger-blockage/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilie-Roulett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/uncert-in-reasoning-blogger-blockage/#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>Great idea, but will this work over the long run?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea, but will this work over the long run?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: India&#8217;s Information Technology (Amendment) Bill Passed By Lok Sabha &#124; MediaNama</title>
		<link>http://www.nikhilpahwa.com/2006/07/18/uncert-in-reasoning-blogger-blockage/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>India&#8217;s Information Technology (Amendment) Bill Passed By Lok Sabha &#124; MediaNama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mixedbag.in/2006/uncert-in-reasoning-blogger-blockage/#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ll update with more on the specifics of the IT Act; we&#8217;re looking, in particular, for the following: &#8211; Interception of person-to-person communication, and the situations under which the government may be allowed to do the same &#8211; Incorporation of a &#8220;Safe Harbor&#8221; provision, like the one that exists in the DMCA. This will free platform service providers like YouTube from the liability that accrues from users who upload infringing content. &#8211; Liability in case of copyrighted transfer of data via P2P - with the person downloading, uploading or both? &#8211; Provisions for blocking of websites: The Indian government did try to block access to certain websites two years ago. My views on the same: How Can A Few People Decide What We View Online? and Uncert-in Reasoning. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] We&#8217;ll update with more on the specifics of the IT Act; we&#8217;re looking, in particular, for the following: &#8211; Interception of person-to-person communication, and the situations under which the government may be allowed to do the same &#8211; Incorporation of a &#8220;Safe Harbor&#8221; provision, like the one that exists in the DMCA. This will free platform service providers like YouTube from the liability that accrues from users who upload infringing content. &#8211; Liability in case of copyrighted transfer of data via P2P - with the person downloading, uploading or both? &#8211; Provisions for blocking of websites: The Indian government did try to block access to certain websites two years ago. My views on the same: How Can A Few People Decide What We View Online? and Uncert-in Reasoning. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

